FabDigitFabDigit

CCF300 vs T1000G

Composite · grade comparison

CCF300 and T1000G are both composite grades. T1000G is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 6,370 MPa (924 ksi) against 3,530 MPa (512 ksi) for CCF300, about 80% more. T1000G is the more ductile: elongation 2.2% versus 1.6% for CCF300. T1000G is stiffer (294 GPa vs 230 GPa) and T1000G runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous). On the shop floor, CCF300 machines more easily (25 vs 15 out of 100).

CCF300Choose it when the part is machined in volume.

T1000GChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

CCF300 vs T1000G: properties

CCF300T1000G

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

230 GPa33.4 Msi
294 GPa42.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

3,530 MPa512 ksi
6,370 MPa924 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.6%
2.2%

Compressive Strength

2,000 MPa290 ksi
1,570 MPa228 ksi

Flexural Strength

—
1,800 MPa261 ksi

Flexural Modulus

—
165 GPa23.9 Msi

Shear Strength

—
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.27

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.78 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.8 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

8 W/m·K4.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
10 W/m·K5.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

-0.4 µm/m·K-0.22 µin/in·°F
-0.5 µm/m·K-0.28 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

350°C662 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 500°C932 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.7×10⁻⁵ Ω·m669 µΩ·in
1.4×10⁻⁵ Ω·m551 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

0 Ω·cm
0 Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

90 / 100
95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

—
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb
600 MJ/kg257,954 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

25 kg CO₂/kg
35 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

1,983 kN·m/kg
3,539 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

129.2 MN·m/kg
163.3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

6 mm²/s
7.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

-307
-433

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCCF300T1000G
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

CCF300 vs T1000G — frequently asked

Is T1000G stronger than CCF300?

Yes. T1000G has a typical tensile strength of 6,370 MPa (924 ksi) against 3,530 MPa (512 ksi) for CCF300 — about 80% more.

Which is cheaper, CCF300 or T1000G?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CCF300 or T1000G?

CCF300, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 15/100 for T1000G.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CCF300 and T1000G side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.