FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum ER1188 vs ER4010

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum ER1188 and ER4010 are both aluminum grades. ER4010 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 20 MPa (2.9 ksi) for ER1188, about 4.8 times as much; tensile strength follows at 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi). In exchange, ER1188 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 5% for ER4010, and ER4010 is harder (55 HB vs 18 HB). ER4010 is stiffer (72 GPa vs 68 GPa) and ER1188 conducts heat better (234 W/m·K vs 152 W/m·K). On the shop floor, ER4010 machines more easily (good vs poor).

ER1188Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ER4010Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

ER1188 vs ER4010: properties

ER1188ER4010

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68 GPa9.9 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.5 GPa3.7 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

75 GPa10.9 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

20 MPa2.9 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
5%

Shear Strength

38 MPa5.5 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

20 MPa2.9 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

18 HB
55 HB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
6 J4.4 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

657°C1,215 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

660°C1,220 °F
613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

234 W/m·K135 BTU/hr·ft·°F
152 W/m·K87.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

64 % IACS
39 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.67×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.05 µΩ·in
4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.85 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
90%

Weldability

96 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

98 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

92 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

16 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

19 kN·m/kg
67 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.2 MN·m/kg
27 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

3 kJ/m³
63 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

96.3 mm²/s
59.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleER1188ER4010

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityER1188ER4010
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

ER1188 vs ER4010 — frequently asked

Is ER4010 stronger than ER1188?

Yes. ER4010 has a typical yield strength of 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 20 MPa (2.9 ksi) for ER1188 — about 4.8 times as much. Tensile strength is 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ER1188 or ER4010?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, ER1188 or ER4010?

ER4010. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (25/100) for ER1188.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ER1188 and ER4010 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.