FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2319 vs ER1188

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 2319 and ER1188 are both aluminum grades. 2319 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 20 MPa (2.9 ksi) for ER1188, about 5.5 times as much; tensile strength follows at 200 MPa (29 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi). In exchange, ER1188 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 16% for 2319, and 2319 is harder (60 HB vs 18 HB). ER1188 is lighter (2.7 g/cm³ vs 2.84 g/cm³ for 2319) and 2319 is stiffer (73 GPa vs 68 GPa). On the shop floor, 2319 machines more easily (good vs poor) and 2319 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than ER1188 (high, $$$$).

2319Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

ER1188Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

2319 vs ER1188: properties

2319ER1188

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

73 GPa10.6 Msi
68 GPa9.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
25.5 GPa3.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

200 MPa29 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

16%
45%

Shear Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
38 MPa5.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

60 HB
18 HB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 75 GPa10.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.84 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

543°C1,009 °F
657°C1,215 °F

Liquidus Temperature

643°C1,189 °F
660°C1,220 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

170 W/m·K98.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
234 W/m·K135 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

864 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.3 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

385 J/g166 BTU/lb
397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-253°C-423 °F
-269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

44 % IACS
64 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.54 µΩ·in
2.67×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.64 V
-0.85 V

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
30%

Weldability

92 / 100
96 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
98 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
92 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
16 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

70 kN·m/kg
19 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.7 MN·m/kg
25.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

83 kJ/m³
3 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

69.3 mm²/s
96.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

21
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2319ER1188

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability2319ER1188
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

2319 vs ER1188 — frequently asked

Is 2319 stronger than ER1188?

Yes. 2319 has a typical yield strength of 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 20 MPa (2.9 ksi) for ER1188 — about 5.5 times as much. Tensile strength is 200 MPa (29 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2319 or ER1188?

2319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while ER1188 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 2319 or ER1188?

2319. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against poor (25/100) for ER1188.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2319 and ER1188 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.