FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum Al2O3f/AC8A vs AlSiC-9

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum Al2O3f/AC8A and AlSiC-9 are both aluminum grades. Al2O3f/AC8A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for AlSiC-9, about 21% more; tensile strength follows at 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi). Al2O3f/AC8A is the more ductile: elongation 0.6% versus 0.4% for AlSiC-9, and AlSiC-9 is harder (215 HB vs 125 HB). Al2O3f/AC8A is lighter (2.79 g/cm³ vs 3.01 g/cm³ for AlSiC-9) and AlSiC-9 is stiffer (188 GPa vs 95 GPa). On the shop floor, Al2O3f/AC8A machines more easily (poor vs not recommended).

Al2O3f/AC8AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Al2O3f/AC8A vs AlSiC-9: properties

Al2O3f/AC8AAlSiC-9

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
188 GPa27.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

37 GPa5.4 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
116 GPa16.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.23

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.6%
0.4%

Reduction in Area

0.8%
—

Compressive Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Shear Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

12 MPa·√m10.9 ksi·√in
8.5 MPa·√m7.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

2 J1.1 ft·lbf
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

125 HB
215 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

70 HRB
97 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

135 HV
230 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
20 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
3.01 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

520°C968 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

575°C1,067 °F
613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

100 W/m·K57.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F
8.5 µm/m·K4.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

440 J/g189 BTU/lb
—

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-269°C-452 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 350°C662 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

24 % IACS
14 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in
1.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.72 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.8 V
-0.75 V

Corrosion Resistance

42 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
8 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
5%

Weldability

10 / 100
8 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
3 / 100

Castability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb
250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

9 kg CO₂/kg
18 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,000 L/kg120 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

93 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

34.1 MN·m/kg
62.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

278 kJ/m³
96 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.7 mm²/s
84.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlSiC-9Al2O3f/AC8A

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAl2O3f/AC8AAlSiC-9
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

Al2O3f/AC8A vs AlSiC-9 — frequently asked

Is Al2O3f/AC8A stronger than AlSiC-9?

Yes. Al2O3f/AC8A has a typical yield strength of 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for AlSiC-9 — about 21% more. Tensile strength is 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Al2O3f/AC8A or AlSiC-9?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Al2O3f/AC8A or AlSiC-9?

Al2O3f/AC8A. Its machinability rates poor (20/100) against not recommended (8/100) for AlSiC-9.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Al2O3f/AC8A and AlSiC-9 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.