FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AC2B vs ADC3

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AC2B and ADC3 are both aluminum grades. ADC3 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for AC2B, about 55% more; tensile strength follows at 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) vs 180 MPa (26.1 ksi). ADC3 is the more ductile: elongation 3.5% versus 2% for AC2B, and ADC3 is harder (75 HB vs 70 HB). ADC3 is lighter (2.64 g/cm³ vs 2.77 g/cm³ for AC2B).

ADC3Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AC2B vs ADC3: properties

AC2BADC3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

28 GPa4.1 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
315 MPa45.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
3.5%

Compressive Strength

115 MPa16.7 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Shear Strength

145 MPa21 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
138 MPa20 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in
18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
75 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.77 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.64 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

516°C961 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
596°C1,105 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
113 W/m·K65.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
29 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
5.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.32 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.81 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

42 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
58 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
—

Weldability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
180 MJ/kg77,386 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
11.5 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

65 kN·m/kg
119 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.7 MN·m/kg
26.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

82 kJ/m³
204 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.9 mm²/s
44.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
24

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAC2BADC3

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAC2BADC3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AC2B vs ADC3 — frequently asked

Is ADC3 stronger than AC2B?

Yes. ADC3 has a typical yield strength of 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for AC2B — about 55% more. Tensile strength is 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) vs 180 MPa (26.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AC2B or ADC3?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AC2B or ADC3?

AC2B, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 58/100 for ADC3; for welding the order is ADC3 first (fair, 40/100) then AC2B (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AC2B and ADC3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.