FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AC1A vs AC2B

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AC1A and AC2B are both aluminum grades. AC1A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for AC2B, about 127% more; tensile strength follows at 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) vs 180 MPa (26.1 ksi). AC1A is the more ductile: elongation 4% versus 2% for AC2B, and AC1A is harder (95 HB vs 70 HB). AC1A runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous) and AC1A conducts heat better (125 W/m·K vs 109 W/m·K). On the shop floor, AC2B welds better (fair vs poor) and AC2B sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than AC1A (premium, $$$).

AC1AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AC2BChoose it when it will be welded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

AC1A vs AC2B: properties

AC1AAC2B

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
28 GPa4.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

335 MPa48.6 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
2%

Compressive Strength

255 MPa37 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Shear Strength

215 MPa31.2 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in
17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
70 HB

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
4 J3 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.8 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.77 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

545°C1,013 °F
516°C961 °F

Liquidus Temperature

645°C1,193 °F
604°C1,119 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

125 W/m·K72.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

920 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F
963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F
21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

31 % IACS
27 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in
6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.7 V
-0.81 V

Corrosion Resistance

33 / 100
42 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

190%
130%

Weldability

25 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
5 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

20%
85%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

120 kN·m/kg
65 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.4 MN·m/kg
26.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

440 kJ/m³
82 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.5 mm²/s
40.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

26
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAC1AAC2B

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAC1AAC2B
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AC1A vs AC2B — frequently asked

Is AC1A stronger than AC2B?

Yes. AC1A has a typical yield strength of 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for AC2B — about 127% more. Tensile strength is 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) vs 180 MPa (26.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AC1A or AC2B?

AC2B is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while AC1A is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, AC1A or AC2B?

AC1A. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (65/100) for AC2B; for welding the order is AC2B first (fair, 35/100) then AC1A (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AC1A and AC2B side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.