FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AC2A vs ADC3

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AC2A and ADC3 are both aluminum grades. ADC3 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for AC2A, about 26% more. ADC3 is the more ductile: elongation 3.5% versus 2% for AC2A, and AC2A is harder (85 HB vs 75 HB). ADC3 is lighter (2.64 g/cm³ vs 2.79 g/cm³ for AC2A) and AC2A runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, AC2A machines more easily (very good vs good).

AC2AChoose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

ADC3Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AC2A vs ADC3: properties

AC2AADC3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
315 MPa45.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
3.5%

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
138 MPa20 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
75 HB

Compressive Strength

—
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 170 MPa24.7 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.64 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

516°C961 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
596°C1,105 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

110 W/m·K63.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
113 W/m·K65.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
29 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
5.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.32 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.75 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

42 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
58 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

70%
—

Weldability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
180 MJ/kg77,386 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
11.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

80%
85%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

90 kN·m/kg
119 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
26.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

195 kJ/m³
204 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.9 mm²/s
44.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
24

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAC2AADC3

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAC2AADC3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AC2A vs ADC3 — frequently asked

Is ADC3 stronger than AC2A?

Yes. ADC3 has a typical tensile strength of 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for AC2A — about 26% more.

Which is cheaper, AC2A or ADC3?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AC2A or ADC3?

AC2A. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (58/100) for ADC3; for welding the order is ADC3 first (fair, 40/100) then AC2A (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AC2A and ADC3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.