Aluminum AC2B vs AC4CH
Aluminum · grade comparison
Aluminum AC2B and AC4CH are both aluminum grades. AC4CH is the stronger of the two: yield strength 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for AC2B, about 91% more; tensile strength follows at 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 180 MPa (26.1 ksi). AC4CH is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 2% for AC2B, and AC4CH is harder (85 HB vs 70 HB). AC4CH is lighter (2.68 g/cm³ vs 2.77 g/cm³ for AC2B) and AC4CH conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 109 W/m·K). On the shop floor, AC4CH welds better (very good vs fair).
AC4CHChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
AC2B vs AC4CH: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all aluminum grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all aluminum grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Hardness, Brinell
Same in both: Bulk Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 4 J3 ft·lbf
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | AC2B | AC4CH |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$ Standard | $$ Standard |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
AC2B vs AC4CH — frequently asked
Is AC4CH stronger than AC2B?
Yes. AC4CH has a typical yield strength of 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for AC2B — about 91% more. Tensile strength is 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 180 MPa (26.1 ksi).
Which is cheaper, AC2B or AC4CH?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, AC2B or AC4CH?
AC2B, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 60/100 for AC4CH; for welding the order is AC4CH first (very good, 75/100) then AC2B (fair, 35/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AC2B and AC4CH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.