FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum A356/SiC/20p vs AlSiC-9

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum A356/SiC/20p and AlSiC-9 are both aluminum grades. A356/SiC/20p is the stronger of the two: yield strength 303 MPa (43.9 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for AlSiC-9, about 59% more; tensile strength follows at 338 MPa (49 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi). A356/SiC/20p is the more ductile: elongation 0.5% versus 0.4% for AlSiC-9, and AlSiC-9 is harder (215 HB vs 118 HB). A356/SiC/20p is lighter (2.76 g/cm³ vs 3.01 g/cm³ for AlSiC-9) and AlSiC-9 is stiffer (188 GPa vs 98 GPa). On the shop floor, A356/SiC/20p welds better (poor vs not recommended).

A356/SiC/20pChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AlSiC-9Choose it when the part sees heat.

A356/SiC/20p vs AlSiC-9: properties

A356/SiC/20pAlSiC-9

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

98 GPa14.2 Msi
188 GPa27.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

38 GPa5.5 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
116 GPa16.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.23

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

338 MPa49 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

303 MPa43.9 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.5%
0.4%

Compressive Strength

500 MPa72.5 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

14 MPa·√m12.7 ksi·√in
8.5 MPa·√m7.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

118 HB
215 HB

Hardness, Vickers

125 HV
230 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
97 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
20 HRC

Same in both: Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.76 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
3.01 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 557°C1,035 °F · Liquidus Temperature 613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

180 W/m·K104 BTU/hr·ft·°F
190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

854 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F
8.5 µm/m·K4.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

300 J/g129 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

28 % IACS
14 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.44 µΩ·in
1.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.72 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.82 V
-0.75 V

Corrosion Resistance

52 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
8 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

12%
5%

Weldability

25 / 100
8 / 100

Formability (cold)

8 / 100
3 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Castability 70 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

235 MJ/kg101,032 BTU/lb
250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14.5 kg CO₂/kg
18 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

122 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

35.5 MN·m/kg
62.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

468 kJ/m³
96 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

76.4 mm²/s
84.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

35
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA356/SiC/20pAlSiC-9

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA356/SiC/20pAlSiC-9
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

A356/SiC/20p vs AlSiC-9 — frequently asked

Is A356/SiC/20p stronger than AlSiC-9?

Yes. A356/SiC/20p has a typical yield strength of 303 MPa (43.9 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for AlSiC-9 — about 59% more. Tensile strength is 338 MPa (49 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A356/SiC/20p or AlSiC-9?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, A356/SiC/20p or AlSiC-9?

A356/SiC/20p. Its machinability rates poor (15/100) against not recommended (8/100) for AlSiC-9; for welding the order is A356/SiC/20p first (poor, 25/100) then AlSiC-9 (not recommended, 8/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A356/SiC/20p and AlSiC-9 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.