FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7005 vs 7021

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7005 and 7021 are both aluminum grades, both high strength al. 7021 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) against 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) for 7005, about 25% more; tensile strength follows at 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi). 7021 is harder — 125 HB against 94 HB for 7005 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 7005 conducts electricity better (40 % IACS vs 33 % IACS). On the shop floor, 7005 welds better (80 vs 70 out of 100).

7005Choose it when it will be welded.

7021Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

7005 vs 7021: properties

70057021

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

295 MPa42.8 ksi
370 MPa53.7 ksi

Compressive Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
375 MPa54.4 ksi

Shear Strength

210 MPa30.5 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

94 HB
125 HB

Hardness, Vickers

105 HV
135 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 12% · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Same in both: Density 2.78 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 645°C1,193 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

149 W/m·K86.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
140 W/m·K80.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

40 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.84 V
-0.85 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Polishability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 70% · Formability (cold) 35 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

126 kN·m/kg
149 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.9 MN·m/kg
25.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

604 kJ/m³
978 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

59.6 mm²/s
57.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

30
35

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70057021

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability70057021
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

7005 vs 7021 — frequently asked

Is 7021 stronger than 7005?

Yes. 7021 has a typical yield strength of 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) against 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) for 7005 — about 25% more. Tensile strength is 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7005 or 7021?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 7005 or 7021?

7005. Its weldability rates very good (80/100) against very good (70/100) for 7021.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7005 and 7021 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.