FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7005 vs 7020

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7005 and 7020 are both aluminum grades, both high strength al. 7020 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) for 7005, about 15% more; tensile strength follows at 385 MPa (55.8 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi). 7020 is harder — 120 HB against 94 HB for 7005 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 7005 conducts heat better (149 W/m·K vs 125 W/m·K).

7020Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

7005 vs 7020: properties

70057020

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
385 MPa55.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

295 MPa42.8 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Compressive Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
345 MPa50 ksi

Shear Strength

210 MPa30.5 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

94 HB
120 HB

Hardness, Vickers

105 HV
128 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 12%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
605°C1,121 °F

Liquidus Temperature

645°C1,193 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Same in both: Density 2.78 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

149 W/m·K86.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
125 W/m·K72.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
875 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
23.1 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

40 % IACS
32 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in
5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.84 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

70%
60%

Weldability

80 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Castability 25 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 20 / 100 · Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

126 kN·m/kg
138 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.9 MN·m/kg
25.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

604 kJ/m³
826 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

59.6 mm²/s
51.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 30

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70057020

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability70057020
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

7005 vs 7020 — frequently asked

Is 7020 stronger than 7005?

Yes. 7020 has a typical yield strength of 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) for 7005 — about 15% more. Tensile strength is 385 MPa (55.8 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7005 or 7020?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 7005 or 7020?

7005, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for 7020.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7005 and 7020 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.