FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7003 vs 7005

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7003 and 7005 are both aluminum grades, both high strength al. 7003 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) against 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) for 7005, about 7% more. 7003 is harder — 105 HB against 94 HB for 7005 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads.

7003Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

7003 vs 7005: properties

70037005

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

315 MPa45.7 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
12%

Compressive Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

105 HB
94 HB

Hardness, Vickers

112 HV
105 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Shear Strength 210 MPa30.5 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

605°C1,121 °F
607°C1,125 °F

Same in both: Density 2.78 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 645°C1,193 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

150 W/m·K86.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
149 W/m·K86.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

875 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.2 µm/m·K12.9 µin/in·°F
23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.86 V
-0.84 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

200%
70%

Weldability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

129 kN·m/kg
126 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.2 MN·m/kg
25.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

709 kJ/m³
604 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

61.7 mm²/s
59.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
30

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70037005

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability70037005
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

7003 vs 7005 — frequently asked

Is 7003 stronger than 7005?

Yes. 7003 has a typical yield strength of 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) against 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) for 7005 — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7003 or 7005?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 7003 or 7005?

7003, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 60/100 for 7005; for welding the order is 7005 first (very good, 80/100) then 7003 (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7003 and 7005 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.