FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7003 vs 7021

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7003 and 7021 are both aluminum grades, both high strength al. 7021 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for 7003, about 17% more; tensile strength follows at 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) vs 360 MPa (52.2 ksi). 7021 is harder — 125 HB against 105 HB for 7003 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 7003 conducts electricity better (39 % IACS vs 33 % IACS).

7021Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

7003 vs 7021: properties

70037021

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

315 MPa45.7 ksi
370 MPa53.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
12%

Compressive Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
375 MPa54.4 ksi

Shear Strength

210 MPa30.5 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

105 HB
125 HB

Hardness, Vickers

112 HV
135 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 130 MPa18.9 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

605°C1,121 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Same in both: Density 2.78 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 645°C1,193 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

150 W/m·K86.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
140 W/m·K80.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

875 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.2 µm/m·K12.9 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.86 V
-0.85 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

200%
70%

Weldability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 35 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

129 kN·m/kg
149 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

709 kJ/m³
978 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

61.7 mm²/s
57.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
35

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.2 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70037021

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability70037021
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

7003 vs 7021 — frequently asked

Is 7021 stronger than 7003?

Yes. 7021 has a typical yield strength of 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for 7003 — about 17% more. Tensile strength is 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) vs 360 MPa (52.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7003 or 7021?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 7003 or 7021?

7003. Its weldability rates very good (75/100) against very good (70/100) for 7021.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7003 and 7021 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.