FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7003 vs 7020

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7003 and 7020 are both aluminum grades, both high strength al. 7020 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for 7003, about 8% more; tensile strength follows at 385 MPa (55.8 ksi) vs 360 MPa (52.2 ksi). 7020 is harder — 120 HB against 105 HB for 7003 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 7003 conducts heat better (150 W/m·K vs 125 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 7003 machines more easily (65 vs 55 out of 100).

7003Choose it when the part is machined in volume.

7020Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

7003 vs 7020: properties

70037020

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
385 MPa55.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

315 MPa45.7 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
12%

Compressive Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
345 MPa50 ksi

Shear Strength

210 MPa30.5 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in
32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

105 HB
120 HB

Hardness, Vickers

112 HV
128 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

645°C1,193 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Same in both: Density 2.78 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 605°C1,121 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

150 W/m·K86.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
125 W/m·K72.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.2 µm/m·K12.9 µin/in·°F
23.1 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 875 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
32 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.86 V
-0.84 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

200%
60%

Weldability

75 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

129 kN·m/kg
138 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

709 kJ/m³
826 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

61.7 mm²/s
51.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
30

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.2 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70037020

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability70037020
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

7003 vs 7020 — frequently asked

Is 7020 stronger than 7003?

Yes. 7020 has a typical yield strength of 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for 7003 — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 385 MPa (55.8 ksi) vs 360 MPa (52.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7003 or 7020?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 7003 or 7020?

7003, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 55/100 for 7020.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7003 and 7020 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.