FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5005 vs 5652

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5005 and 5652 are both aluminum grades, both corrosion resistant al. 5652 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005, about 41% more; tensile strength follows at 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi). 5652 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 8% for 5005, and 5652 is harder (60 HB vs 41 HB). 5652 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 5005 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 138 W/m·K).

5652Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

5005 vs 5652: properties

50055652

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
70.3 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

159 MPa23.1 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

138 MPa20 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
12%

Shear Strength

96 MPa13.9 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

41 HB
60 HB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 25.9 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

632°C1,170 °F
607°C1,125 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-270°C-454 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

52 % IACS
35 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.3 µΩ·in
4.93×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.94 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.85 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
30%

Weldability

88 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

72 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
86 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

138 kJ/m³
270 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.3 mm²/s
57.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 19

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50055652

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50055652
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

5005 vs 5652 — frequently asked

Is 5652 stronger than 5005?

Yes. 5652 has a typical yield strength of 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005 — about 41% more. Tensile strength is 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5005 or 5652?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 5005 or 5652?

5652, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 45/100 for 5005.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5005 and 5652 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.