FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5005 vs 5049

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5005 and 5049 are both aluminum grades. 5049 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005, about 9% more; tensile strength follows at 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi). 5049 is the more ductile: elongation 11% versus 8% for 5005, and 5049 is harder (62 HB vs 41 HB). 5005 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 138 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5005 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5049 (premium, $$$).

5005Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

5049Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

5005 vs 5049: properties

50055049

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.9 GPa3.8 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

159 MPa23.1 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

138 MPa20 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
11%

Shear Strength

96 MPa13.9 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

41 HB
62 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
66 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.69 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

632°C1,170 °F
610°C1,130 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
23.7 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

52 % IACS
35 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.3 µΩ·in
4.93×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.94 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.86 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
30%

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

—
30 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 45 / 100 · Weldability 88 / 100 · Formability (cold) 72 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
89 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

138 kJ/m³
161 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.3 mm²/s
57 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50055049

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50055049
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

5005 vs 5049 — frequently asked

Is 5049 stronger than 5005?

Yes. 5049 has a typical yield strength of 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005 — about 9% more. Tensile strength is 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5005 or 5049?

5005 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5049 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose 5005 over 5049?

Pick 5005 when cost is the deciding factor. Pick 5049 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5005 and 5049 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.