FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5005 vs 5021

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5005 and 5021 are both aluminum grades. 5021 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005, about 96% more; tensile strength follows at 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi). In exchange, 5005 is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 4% for 5021, and 5021 is harder (85 HB vs 41 HB). 5005 runs hotter in service (120°C vs 100°C continuous) and 5005 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 138 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5005 welds better (excellent vs very good) and 5005 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5021 (premium, $$$).

5005Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

5021Choose it when strength drives the design.

5005 vs 5021: properties

50055021

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.9 GPa3.8 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

159 MPa23.1 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

138 MPa20 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
4%

Shear Strength

96 MPa13.9 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
135 MPa19.6 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

41 HB
85 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
92 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

632°C1,170 °F
607°C1,125 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
100°C212 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

52 % IACS
35 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.3 µΩ·in
4.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.93 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.85 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
30%

Weldability

88 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

72 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
65 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
112 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

138 kJ/m³
521 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.3 mm²/s
57.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50055021

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50055021
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

5005 vs 5021 — frequently asked

Is 5021 stronger than 5005?

Yes. 5021 has a typical yield strength of 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for 5005 — about 96% more. Tensile strength is 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) vs 159 MPa (23.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5005 or 5021?

5005 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5021 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 5005 or 5021?

5005. Its weldability rates excellent (88/100) against very good (78/100) for 5021.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5005 and 5021 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.