FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 356 vs A390

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 356 and A390 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. A390 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 186 MPa (27 ksi) for 356, about 29% more; tensile strength follows at 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi). In exchange, 356 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 1% for A390, and A390 is harder (120 HB vs 80 HB). A390 is stiffer (81 GPa vs 72.4 GPa) and A390 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 356 machines more easily (very good vs poor), 356 welds better (very good vs poor), and 356 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A390 (standard, $$).

356Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

A390Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

356 vs A390: properties

356A390

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72.4 GPa10.5 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
30.5 GPa4.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

186 MPa27 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
1%

Compressive Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Shear Strength

179 MPa26 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
12 MPa·√m10.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

80 HB
120 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
125 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

557°C1,035 °F
507°C945 °F

Liquidus Temperature

613°C1,135 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
134 W/m·K77.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
460 J/g198 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
25 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
6.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.72 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
42 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

120%
40%

Weldability

78 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
3 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

60%
55%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

98 kN·m/kg
103 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.1 MN·m/kg
29.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

239 kJ/m³
356 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.7 mm²/s
51 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
26

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356A390

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability356A390
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

356 vs A390 — frequently asked

Is A390 stronger than 356?

Yes. A390 has a typical yield strength of 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 186 MPa (27 ksi) for 356 — about 29% more. Tensile strength is 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 356 or A390?

356 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A390 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 356 or A390?

356. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against poor (30/100) for A390; for welding the order is 356 first (very good, 78/100) then A390 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 356 and A390 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.