FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 355 vs A390

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 355 and A390 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. A390 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355, about 33% more; tensile strength follows at 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi). In exchange, 355 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 1% for A390, and A390 is harder (120 HB vs 85 HB). A390 is stiffer (81 GPa vs 71 GPa) and A390 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 175°C continuous). On the shop floor, 355 machines more easily (good vs poor), 355 welds better (good vs poor), and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A390 (standard, $$).

355Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

A390Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

355 vs A390: properties

355A390

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
30.5 GPa4.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
1%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
12 MPa·√m10.9 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
120 HB

Compressive Strength

—
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

—
125 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Shear Strength 195 MPa28.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

546°C1,015 °F
507°C945 °F

Liquidus Temperature

621°C1,150 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
134 W/m·K77.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
460 J/g198 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
25 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
6.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.72 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
42 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.78 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
40%

Weldability

55 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
3 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
55%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
103 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
29.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

228 kJ/m³
356 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

57.9 mm²/s
51 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
26

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355A390

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability355A390
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

355 vs A390 — frequently asked

Is A390 stronger than 355?

Yes. A390 has a typical yield strength of 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) for 355 — about 33% more. Tensile strength is 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 355 or A390?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A390 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 355 or A390?

355. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against poor (30/100) for A390; for welding the order is 355 first (good, 55/100) then A390 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 355 and A390 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.