FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 356 vs 380

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 356 and 380 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. 356 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 160 MPa (23.2 ksi) for 380, about 16% more. 356 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 3% for 380. 356 is lighter (2.67 g/cm³ vs 2.76 g/cm³ for 380) and 356 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 96 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 356 welds better (very good vs poor).

356Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

356 vs 380: properties

356380

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72.4 GPa10.5 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
325 MPa47.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

186 MPa27 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
3%

Compressive Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
—

Shear Strength

179 MPa26 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

—
85 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Hardness, Brinell 80 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.76 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

557°C1,035 °F
540°C1,004 °F

Liquidus Temperature

613°C1,135 °F
595°C1,103 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
96 W/m·K55.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
21.8 µm/m·K12.1 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
24 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.79 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
68 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

120%
130%

Weldability

78 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Castability 95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
155 MJ/kg66,638 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
10.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
90%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

98 kN·m/kg
118 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.1 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

239 kJ/m³
180 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.7 mm²/s
36.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale356380

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability356380
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

356 vs 380 — frequently asked

Is 356 stronger than 380?

Yes. 356 has a typical yield strength of 186 MPa (27 ksi) against 160 MPa (23.2 ksi) for 380 — about 16% more. Tensile strength is 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 325 MPa (47.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 356 or 380?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 356 or 380?

356. Its weldability rates very good (78/100) against poor (25/100) for 380.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 356 and 380 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.