FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al vs Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al and Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al are both titanium grades. Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) against 860 MPa (125 ksi) for Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al, about 44% more; tensile strength follows at 1,300 MPa (189 ksi) vs 930 MPa (135 ksi). In exchange, Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al is the more ductile: elongation 16% versus 8% for Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al, and Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al is harder (370 HB vs 300 HB). Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al is stiffer (110 GPa vs 102 GPa) and Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al runs hotter in service (315°C vs 260°C continuous). On the shop floor, Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al welds better (good vs fair).

Ti-13V-11Cr-3AlChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3AlChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al vs Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al: properties

Ti-13V-11Cr-3AlTi-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

102 GPa14.8 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

40 GPa5.8 Msi
42 GPa6.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
108 GPa15.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

930 MPa135 ksi
1,300 MPa189 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

860 MPa125 ksi
1,240 MPa180 ksi

Elongation at Break

16%
8%

Reduction in Area

35%
20%

Compressive Strength

880 MPa128 ksi
1,300 MPa189 ksi

Shear Strength

590 MPa85.6 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

85 MPa·√m77.4 ksi·√in
45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

22 J16.2 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

300 HB
370 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

31 HRC
40 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

315 HV
390 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.87 g/cm³0.18 lb/in³
4.9 g/cm³0.18 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,427°C2,601 °F
1,600°C2,912 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,480°C2,696 °F
1,650°C3,002 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

7.8 W/m·K4.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
6.5 W/m·K3.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

9 µm/m·K5 µin/in·°F
9.2 µm/m·K5.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

320 J/g138 BTU/lb
360 J/g155 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

260°C500 °F
315°C599 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.4×10⁻⁶ Ω·m55.1 µΩ·in
1.45×10⁻⁶ Ω·m57.1 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.2 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

16 / 100
14 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

15%
12%

Weldability

55 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
—

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

650 MJ/kg279,450 BTU/lb
700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 45 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

191 kN·m/kg
265 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

20.9 MN·m/kg
22.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

3,625 kJ/m³
6,989 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.2 mm²/s
2.7 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTi-13V-11Cr-3AlTi-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityTi-13V-11Cr-3AlTi-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al vs Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al — frequently asked

Is Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al stronger than Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al?

Yes. Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al has a typical yield strength of 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) against 860 MPa (125 ksi) for Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al — about 44% more. Tensile strength is 1,300 MPa (189 ksi) vs 930 MPa (135 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al or Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al or Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al?

Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against fair (35/100) for Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al and Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.