FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al vs Ti-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al and Ti-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si are both titanium grades. Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al is the stronger of the two: yield strength 860 MPa (125 ksi) against 810 MPa (117 ksi) for Ti-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si, about 6% more; tensile strength follows at 930 MPa (135 ksi) vs 840 MPa (122 ksi). In exchange, Ti-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 16% for Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al, and Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al is harder (31 HRC vs 28 HRC). Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al is stiffer (102 GPa vs 80 GPa) and Ti-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si runs hotter in service (480°C vs 260°C continuous).

Ti-13V-11Cr-3AlChoose it when strength drives the design.

Ti-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2SiChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al vs Ti-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si: properties

Ti-13V-11Cr-3AlTi-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

102 GPa14.8 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

40 GPa5.8 Msi
30 GPa4.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

930 MPa135 ksi
840 MPa122 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

860 MPa125 ksi
810 MPa117 ksi

Elongation at Break

16%
18%

Reduction in Area

35%
40%

Compressive Strength

880 MPa128 ksi
840 MPa122 ksi

Shear Strength

590 MPa85.6 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

85 MPa·√m77.4 ksi·√in
65 MPa·√m59.2 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

22 J16.2 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

300 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

31 HRC
28 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

315 HV
285 HV

Same in both: Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 450 MPa65.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.87 g/cm³0.18 lb/in³
4.94 g/cm³0.18 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,427°C2,601 °F
1,600°C2,912 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,480°C2,696 °F
1,650°C3,002 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

7.8 W/m·K4.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
7.6 W/m·K4.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

9 µm/m·K5 µin/in·°F
7.7 µm/m·K4.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

320 J/g138 BTU/lb
360 J/g155 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

260°C500 °F
480°C896 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-70°C-94 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.2 % IACS
1.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.4×10⁻⁶ Ω·m55.1 µΩ·in
1.35×10⁻⁶ Ω·m53.1 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

16 / 100
20 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 15% · Brazeability / Solderability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

650 MJ/kg279,450 BTU/lb
700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

45 kg CO₂/kg
42 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
550 L/kg65.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

191 kN·m/kg
170 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

20.9 MN·m/kg
16.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

3,625 kJ/m³
4,101 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.2 mm²/s
3.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTi-13V-11Cr-3AlTi-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityTi-13V-11Cr-3AlTi-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al vs Ti-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si — frequently asked

Is Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al stronger than Ti-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si?

Yes. Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al has a typical yield strength of 860 MPa (125 ksi) against 810 MPa (117 ksi) for Ti-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 930 MPa (135 ksi) vs 840 MPa (122 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al or Ti-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al or Ti-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si?

Ti-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si. Its weldability rates good (60/100) against good (55/100) for Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al and Ti-15Mo-2.7Nb-3Al-0.2Si side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.