FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Ti-10-2-3 vs Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Ti-10-2-3 and Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al are both titanium grades. Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) against 930 MPa (135 ksi) for Ti-10-2-3, about 33% more; tensile strength follows at 1,300 MPa (189 ksi) vs 1,000 MPa (145 ksi). In exchange, Ti-10-2-3 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 8% for Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al, and Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al is harder (40 HRC vs 32 HRC). Ti-10-2-3 is lighter (4.65 g/cm³ vs 4.9 g/cm³ for Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al) and Ti-10-2-3 conducts heat better (7.8 W/m·K vs 6.5 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Ti-10-2-3 (specialty, $$$$$).

Ti-10-2-3Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3AlChoose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Ti-10-2-3 vs Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al: properties

Ti-10-2-3Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

41 GPa5.9 Msi
42 GPa6.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

104 GPa15.1 Msi
108 GPa15.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,000 MPa145 ksi
1,300 MPa189 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

930 MPa135 ksi
1,240 MPa180 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
8%

Reduction in Area

25%
20%

Compressive Strength

1,000 MPa145 ksi
1,300 MPa189 ksi

Shear Strength

620 MPa89.9 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

85 MPa·√m77.4 ksi·√in
45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

32 HRC
40 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

320 HV
390 HV

Hardness, Brinell

—
370 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 110 GPa16 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.65 g/cm³0.17 lb/in³
4.9 g/cm³0.18 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,600°C2,912 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,650°C3,002 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

7.8 W/m·K4.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
6.5 W/m·K3.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

9 µm/m·K5 µin/in·°F
9.2 µm/m·K5.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

365 J/g157 BTU/lb
360 J/g155 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
315°C599 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.4×10⁻⁶ Ω·m55.1 µΩ·in
1.45×10⁻⁶ Ω·m57.1 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.2 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V · Corrosion Resistance 85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
14 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

18%
12%

Weldability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
—

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

650 MJ/kg279,450 BTU/lb
700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

40 kg CO₂/kg
45 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

215 kN·m/kg
265 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.7 MN·m/kg
22.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

3,931 kJ/m³
6,989 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.4 mm²/s
2.7 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTi-10-2-3Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityTi-10-2-3Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall1 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
TiAlNYes—
TiB2Yes—
TiCNYes—
TiNYes—
WC/CYes—

They share 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Ti-10-2-3 vs Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al — frequently asked

Is Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al stronger than Ti-10-2-3?

Yes. Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al has a typical yield strength of 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) against 930 MPa (135 ksi) for Ti-10-2-3 — about 33% more. Tensile strength is 1,300 MPa (189 ksi) vs 1,000 MPa (145 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Ti-10-2-3 or Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al?

Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Ti-10-2-3 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Ti-10-2-3 or Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al?

Ti-10-2-3. Its machinability rates poor (20/100) against not recommended (14/100) for Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al; for welding the order is Ti-10-2-3 first (fair, 40/100) then Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Ti-10-2-3 and Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.