FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al vs Ti-5553

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al and Ti-5553 are both titanium grades. Both yield at about 860 MPa — strength does not separate them. Ti-5553 is harder — 33 HRC against 31 HRC for Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Ti-5553 is lighter (4.65 g/cm³ vs 4.87 g/cm³ for Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al) and Ti-5553 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 260°C continuous). On the shop floor, Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al welds better (good vs fair), Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al forms better (very good vs poor), and Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Ti-5553 (specialty, $$$$$).

Ti-13V-11Cr-3AlChoose it when it will be welded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Ti-5553Choose it when surface hardness matters, or when weight is the constraint.

Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al vs Ti-5553: properties

Ti-13V-11Cr-3AlTi-5553

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

102 GPa14.8 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

930 MPa135 ksi
960 MPa139 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

860 MPa125 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Reduction in Area

35%
40%

Compressive Strength

880 MPa128 ksi
940 MPa136 ksi

Shear Strength

590 MPa85.6 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

85 MPa·√m77.4 ksi·√in
80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

22 J16.2 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

300 HB
305 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

31 HRC
33 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

315 HV
320 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 40 GPa5.8 Msi · Elongation at Break 16%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.87 g/cm³0.18 lb/in³
4.65 g/cm³0.17 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,427°C2,601 °F
1,580°C2,876 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,480°C2,696 °F
1,640°C2,984 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

7.8 W/m·K4.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
7 W/m·K4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

9 µm/m·K5 µin/in·°F
9.3 µm/m·K5.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

320 J/g138 BTU/lb
360 J/g155 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

260°C500 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.2 % IACS
1.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.4×10⁻⁶ Ω·m55.1 µΩ·in
1.55×10⁻⁶ Ω·m61 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.1 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 88 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

15%
16%

Weldability

55 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 16 / 100 · Castability 25 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

45 kg CO₂/kg
42 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
800 L/kg95.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 650 MJ/kg279,450 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

191 kN·m/kg
206 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

20.9 MN·m/kg
22.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

3,625 kJ/m³
3,857 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.2 mm²/s
3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTi-5553Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityTi-13V-11Cr-3AlTi-5553
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—O
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—1 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Anodizing Type II—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
TiAlN—Yes
TiB2—Yes
TiCN—Yes
TiN—Yes
WC/C—Yes

They share 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al vs Ti-5553 — frequently asked

What is the difference between Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al and Ti-5553?

Titanium Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al and Ti-5553 are both titanium grades. Both yield at about 860 MPa — strength does not separate them. Ti-5553 is harder — 33 HRC against 31 HRC for Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al — which matters for wear surfaces and threads.

Which is cheaper, Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al or Ti-5553?

Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Ti-5553 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al or Ti-5553?

Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against fair (35/100) for Ti-5553.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al and Ti-5553 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.