Titanium Grade 9 vs Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo
Titanium · grade comparison
Titanium Grade 9 and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo are both titanium grades. Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) against 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) for Grade 9, about 93% more; tensile strength follows at 1,170 MPa (170 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi). In exchange, Grade 9 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 10% for Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo, and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo is harder (350 HB vs 250 HB). Grade 9 is lighter (4.48 g/cm³ vs 4.65 g/cm³ for Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo) and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo is stiffer (114 GPa vs 100 GPa). On the shop floor, Grade 9 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and Grade 9 welds better (very good vs poor).
Grade 9Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.
Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6MoChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.
Grade 9 vs Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all titanium grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all titanium grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell C
Hardness, Vickers
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 365 J/g157 BTU/lb
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Water
Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 42 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 25%
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | Grade 9 | Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo |
|---|---|---|
| CNC machining | Yes | — |
| Sheet metal | Yes | — |
| Default condition | O | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | 1 mm | — |
| Best machined surface | Ra 1.6 µm | — |
| AlCrN | Yes | — |
| AlTiN | Yes | — |
| Anodizing Type II | Yes | — |
| CVD Al2O3 | Yes | — |
| CVD TiCN | Yes | — |
| CVD TiN | Yes | — |
| Cerakote | Yes | — |
| CrN | Yes | — |
| DLC | Yes | — |
| Electropolishing | Yes | — |
| HVOF Coating | Yes | — |
| MoS2 | Yes | — |
| Multilayer CVD | Yes | — |
| TiAlN | Yes | — |
| TiB2 | Yes | — |
| TiCN | Yes | — |
| TiN | Yes | — |
| WC/C | Yes | — |
They share 1 finish: Plasma Spray.
Grade 9 vs Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo — frequently asked
Is Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo stronger than Grade 9?
Yes. Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo has a typical yield strength of 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) against 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) for Grade 9 — about 93% more. Tensile strength is 1,170 MPa (170 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).
Which is cheaper, Grade 9 or Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, Grade 9 or Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo?
Grade 9. Its machinability rates poor (28/100) against not recommended (14/100) for Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo; for welding the order is Grade 9 first (very good, 80/100) then Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo (poor, 30/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Grade 9 and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.
