FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Grade 9 vs Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Grade 9 and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo are both titanium grades. Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) against 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) for Grade 9, about 93% more; tensile strength follows at 1,170 MPa (170 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi). In exchange, Grade 9 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 10% for Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo, and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo is harder (350 HB vs 250 HB). Grade 9 is lighter (4.48 g/cm³ vs 4.65 g/cm³ for Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo) and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo is stiffer (114 GPa vs 100 GPa). On the shop floor, Grade 9 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and Grade 9 welds better (very good vs poor).

Grade 9Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6MoChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Grade 9 vs Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo: properties

Grade 9Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
114 GPa16.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
43 GPa6.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

107 GPa15.5 Msi
112 GPa16.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

690 MPa100 ksi
1,170 MPa170 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

570 MPa82.7 ksi
1,100 MPa160 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
10%

Reduction in Area

38%
22%

Compressive Strength

600 MPa87 ksi
1,180 MPa171 ksi

Shear Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
720 MPa104 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

250 HB
350 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

24 HRC
38 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

260 HV
370 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.48 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.65 g/cm³0.17 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,650°C3,002 °F
1,590°C2,894 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,704°C3,099 °F
1,650°C3,002 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

7.6 W/m·K4.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
6.6 W/m·K3.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

544 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F
480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

9.2 µm/m·K5.1 µin/in·°F
8 µm/m·K4.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 365 J/g157 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.4 % IACS
1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.26×10⁻⁶ Ω·m49.6 µΩ·in
1.8×10⁻⁶ Ω·m70.9 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
88 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
14 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
12%

Weldability

80 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

650 MJ/kg279,450 BTU/lb
700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
1,000 L/kg120 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 42 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

154 kN·m/kg
252 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.3 MN·m/kg
24.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,625 kJ/m³
5,307 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.1 mm²/s
3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleGrade 9Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityGrade 9Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall1 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
TiAlNYes—
TiB2Yes—
TiCNYes—
TiNYes—
WC/CYes—

They share 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Grade 9 vs Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo — frequently asked

Is Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo stronger than Grade 9?

Yes. Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo has a typical yield strength of 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) against 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) for Grade 9 — about 93% more. Tensile strength is 1,170 MPa (170 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Grade 9 or Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Grade 9 or Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo?

Grade 9. Its machinability rates poor (28/100) against not recommended (14/100) for Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo; for welding the order is Grade 9 first (very good, 80/100) then Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Grade 9 and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.