FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium C-9 vs Grade C-5

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium C-9 and Grade C-5 are both titanium grades. Grade C-5 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 865 MPa (125 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for C-9, about 57% more; tensile strength follows at 940 MPa (136 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi). In exchange, C-9 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 10% for Grade C-5, and Grade C-5 is harder (330 HB vs 240 HB). Grade C-5 is stiffer (112 GPa vs 100 GPa) and Grade C-5 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, C-9 welds better (very good vs good).

C-9Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

Grade C-5Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C-9 vs Grade C-5: properties

C-9Grade C-5

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
112 GPa16.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
43 GPa6.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

690 MPa100 ksi
940 MPa136 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
865 MPa125 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
10%

Reduction in Area

20%
18%

Compressive Strength

620 MPa89.9 ksi
970 MPa141 ksi

Shear Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
580 MPa84.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
85 MPa·√m77.4 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

22 J16.2 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

240 HB
330 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

23 HRC
35 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

255 HV
345 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 110 GPa16 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.48 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.43 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,650°C3,002 °F
1,604°C2,919 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,700°C3,092 °F
1,650°C3,002 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

7.6 W/m·K4.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
6.8 W/m·K3.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

544 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F
560 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

9.4 µm/m·K5.2 µin/in·°F
8.7 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

365 J/g157 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.4 % IACS
1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.26×10⁻⁶ Ω·m49.6 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁶ Ω·m66.9 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
88 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
15 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 22% · Castability 70 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

650 MJ/kg279,450 BTU/lb
660 MJ/kg283,749 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

42 kg CO₂/kg
44 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

450 L/kg53.9 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

154 kN·m/kg
212 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.3 MN·m/kg
25.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,513 kJ/m³
3,340 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.1 mm²/s
2.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC-9Grade C-5

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC-9Grade C-5
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

C-9 vs Grade C-5 — frequently asked

Is Grade C-5 stronger than C-9?

Yes. Grade C-5 has a typical yield strength of 865 MPa (125 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for C-9 — about 57% more. Tensile strength is 940 MPa (136 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C-9 or Grade C-5?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C-9 or Grade C-5?

C-9, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 20/100 for Grade C-5; for welding the order is C-9 first (very good, 80/100) then Grade C-5 (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C-9 and Grade C-5 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.