FabDigitFabDigit

Steel K93050 vs K93603

Steel · grade comparison

Steel K93050 and K93603 are both steel grades. Both yield at about 280 MPa — strength does not separate them. K93050 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 32% for K93603, and K93603 is harder (145 HB vs 135 HB). K93050 runs hotter in service (230°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, K93603 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and K93050 welds better (very good vs poor).

K93050Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

K93603Choose it when the part is machined in volume.

K93050 vs K93603: properties

K93050K93603

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

112 GPa16.2 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

490 MPa71.1 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
32%

Reduction in Area

70%
55%

Compressive Strength

285 MPa41.3 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

180 J133 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

135 HB
145 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

75 HRB
78 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

140 HV
152 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 141 GPa20.5 Msi · Shear Modulus 55 GPa8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Shear Strength 340 MPa49.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 8.05 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,427°C2,601 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

1.3 µm/m·K0.72 µin/in·°F
1.7 µm/m·K0.94 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
275 J/g118 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

230°C446 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 10.5 W/m·K6.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 515 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.1 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 8.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m32.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.4 V
-0.35 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 28 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
45%

Weldability

75 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

66 MJ/kg28,375 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

61 kN·m/kg
60 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

278 kJ/m³
259 kJ/m³

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

28
21

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 17.5 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 2.5 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleK93050K93603

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityK93050K93603
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

K93050 vs K93603 — frequently asked

What is the difference between K93050 and K93603?

Steel K93050 and K93603 are both steel grades. Both yield at about 280 MPa — strength does not separate them. K93050 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 32% for K93603, and K93603 is harder (145 HB vs 135 HB).

Which is cheaper, K93050 or K93603?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, K93050 or K93603?

K93603. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (30/100) for K93050; for welding the order is K93050 first (very good, 75/100) then K93603 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in K93050 and K93603 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.