Steel 4J50 vs K93050
Steel · grade comparison
Steel 4J50 and K93050 are both steel grades. Both yield at about 280 MPa — strength does not separate them. K93050 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 35% for 4J50. 4J50 is stiffer (150 GPa vs 141 GPa) and 4J50 runs hotter in service (500°C vs 230°C continuous).
4J50Choose it when the part sees heat.
K93050Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
4J50 vs K93050: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Compressive Strength
Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 280 MPa40.6 ksi · Hardness, Brinell 135 HB · Hardness, Rockwell B 75 HRB · Hardness, Vickers 140 HV
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Weldability
Brazeability / Solderability
Castability
Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30% · Formability (cold) 85 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | 4J50 | K93050 |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.
4J50 vs K93050 — frequently asked
What is the difference between 4J50 and K93050?
Steel 4J50 and K93050 are both steel grades. Both yield at about 280 MPa — strength does not separate them. K93050 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 35% for 4J50.
Which is cheaper, 4J50 or K93050?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, 4J50 or K93050?
4J50. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (30/100) for K93050; for welding the order is K93050 first (very good, 75/100) then 4J50 (very good, 70/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 4J50 and K93050 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.