FabDigitFabDigit

Steel CA6NM vs WC4

Steel · grade comparison

Steel CA6NM and WC4 are both steel grades. CA6NM is the stronger of the two: yield strength 690 MPa (100 ksi) against 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) for WC4, about 106% more; tensile strength follows at 830 MPa (120 ksi) vs 545 MPa (79 ksi). In exchange, WC4 is the more ductile: elongation 24% versus 20% for CA6NM, and CA6NM is harder (260 HB vs 163 HB). WC4 runs hotter in service (540°C vs 450°C continuous) and WC4 conducts heat better (42 W/m·K vs 25 W/m·K). On the shop floor, WC4 machines more easily (good vs fair), CA6NM welds better (very good vs good), and WC4 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than CA6NM (premium, $$$).

CA6NMChoose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

WC4Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

CA6NM vs WC4: properties

CA6NMWC4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

77 GPa11.2 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

830 MPa120 ksi
545 MPa79 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

690 MPa100 ksi
335 MPa48.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
24%

Reduction in Area

60%
50%

Compressive Strength

690 MPa100 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Shear Strength

500 MPa72.5 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

150 MPa·√m137 ksi·√in
120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

100 J73.8 ft·lbf
48 J35.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

260 HB
163 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

25 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

275 HV
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
85 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.83 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,500°C2,732 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.5 µm/m·K5.8 µin/in·°F
12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
540°C1,004 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-29°C-20 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.3 % IACS
7.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.9 µΩ·in
2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.32 V
-0.62 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
14 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
58 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
60%

Weldability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

40 MJ/kg17,197 BTU/lb
26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.5 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
75%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

108 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,190 kJ/m³
281 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.1 mm²/s
11.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleWC4CA6NM

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCA6NMWC4
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

CA6NM vs WC4 — frequently asked

Is CA6NM stronger than WC4?

Yes. CA6NM has a typical yield strength of 690 MPa (100 ksi) against 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) for WC4 — about 106% more. Tensile strength is 830 MPa (120 ksi) vs 545 MPa (79 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CA6NM or WC4?

WC4 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while CA6NM is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, CA6NM or WC4?

WC4. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (40/100) for CA6NM; for welding the order is CA6NM first (very good, 70/100) then WC4 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CA6NM and WC4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.