FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 35# vs CA6NM

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 35# and CA6NM are both steel grades. CA6NM is the stronger of the two: yield strength 690 MPa (100 ksi) against 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) for 35#, about 109% more; tensile strength follows at 830 MPa (120 ksi) vs 560 MPa (81.2 ksi). CA6NM is harder — 260 HB against 160 HB for 35# — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. CA6NM runs hotter in service (450°C vs 400°C continuous) and 35# conducts heat better (49 W/m·K vs 25 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 35# machines more easily (good vs fair), CA6NM welds better (very good vs good), and 35# forms better (fair vs poor).

35#Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when cost is the deciding factor.

CA6NMChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

35# vs CA6NM: properties

35#CA6NM

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

207 GPa30 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

560 MPa81.2 ksi
830 MPa120 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
20%

Reduction in Area

50%
60%

Shear Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in
150 MPa·√m137 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
100 J73.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

160 HB
260 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

83 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

168 HV
275 HV

Compressive Strength

—
690 MPa100 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
25 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,500°C2,732 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

49 W/m·K28.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

477 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.6 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
10.5 µm/m·K5.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
450°C842 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10 % IACS
2.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in
7.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.9 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.65 V
-0.32 V

Corrosion Resistance

11 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
45%

Weldability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
40 MJ/kg17,197 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
3.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb
110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

71 kN·m/kg
108 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.4 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

263 kJ/m³
1,190 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.1 mm²/s
7.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

11
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale35#CA6NM

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability35#CA6NM
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

35# vs CA6NM — frequently asked

Is CA6NM stronger than 35#?

Yes. CA6NM has a typical yield strength of 690 MPa (100 ksi) against 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) for 35# — about 109% more. Tensile strength is 830 MPa (120 ksi) vs 560 MPa (81.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 35# or CA6NM?

35# is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while CA6NM is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 35# or CA6NM?

35#. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (40/100) for CA6NM; for welding the order is CA6NM first (very good, 70/100) then 35# (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 35# and CA6NM side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.