FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A757 Grade C3 vs WC4

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A757 Grade C3 and WC4 are both steel grades. A757 Grade C3 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) against 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) for WC4, about 37% more; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 545 MPa (79 ksi). A757 Grade C3 is harder — 190 HB against 163 HB for WC4 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. WC4 runs hotter in service (540°C vs 400°C continuous) and WC4 conducts heat better (42 W/m·K vs 36 W/m·K). On the shop floor, WC4 forms better (poor vs not recommended) and WC4 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than A757 Grade C3 (premium, $$$).

A757 Grade C3Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

WC4Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

A757 Grade C3 vs WC4: properties

A757 Grade C3WC4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

202 GPa29.3 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
545 MPa79 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

460 MPa66.7 ksi
335 MPa48.6 ksi

Reduction in Area

48%
50%

Compressive Strength

460 MPa66.7 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Shear Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

270 MPa39.2 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

90 J66.4 ft·lbf
48 J35.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

190 HB
163 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

91 HRB
85 HRB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 78 GPa11.3 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Elongation at Break 24%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.83 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,500°C2,732 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
540°C1,004 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-29°C-20 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

2.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m10.2 µΩ·in
2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Electrical Conductivity

—
7.8 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.61 V
-0.62 V

Corrosion Resistance

13 / 100
14 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
58 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
60%

Weldability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

68 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb
26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.3 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

85%
75%

Same in both: Embodied Water 55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

79 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.7 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

524 kJ/m³
281 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.6 mm²/s
11.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleWC4A757 Grade C3

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA757 Grade C3WC4
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A757 Grade C3 vs WC4 — frequently asked

Is A757 Grade C3 stronger than WC4?

Yes. A757 Grade C3 has a typical yield strength of 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) against 335 MPa (48.6 ksi) for WC4 — about 37% more. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 545 MPa (79 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A757 Grade C3 or WC4?

WC4 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while A757 Grade C3 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, A757 Grade C3 or WC4?

A757 Grade C3. Its weldability rates good (60/100) against good (55/100) for WC4.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A757 Grade C3 and WC4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.