FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A536 120-90-02 vs A536 80-55-06

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A536 120-90-02 and A536 80-55-06 are both steel grades. A536 120-90-02 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for A536 80-55-06, about 65% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 575 MPa (83.4 ksi). In exchange, A536 80-55-06 is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 3% for A536 120-90-02, and A536 120-90-02 is harder (302 HB vs 195 HB). On the shop floor, A536 80-55-06 machines more easily (very good vs fair), A536 80-55-06 welds better (30 vs 18 out of 100), and A536 80-55-06 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A536 120-90-02 (standard, $$).

A536 120-90-02Choose it when strength drives the design.

A536 80-55-06Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

A536 120-90-02 vs A536 80-55-06: properties

A536 120-90-02A536 80-55-06

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

172 GPa24.9 Msi
169 GPa24.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

66 GPa9.6 Msi
65 GPa9.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

138 GPa20 Msi
135 GPa19.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

900 MPa131 ksi
575 MPa83.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

660 MPa95.7 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
8%

Reduction in Area

3%
—

Compressive Strength

1,500 MPa218 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Shear Strength

800 MPa116 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

35 MPa·√m31.9 ksi·√in
32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

9 J6.6 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

302 HB
195 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

32 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

318 HV
205 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
92 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.28

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,140°C2,084 °F
1,150°C2,102 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,165°C2,129 °F
1,170°C2,138 °F

Same in both: Density 7.1 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

32 W/m·K18.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
35 W/m·K20.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 350°C662 °F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.7 % IACS
2.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.2 µΩ·in
6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

16 / 100
15 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.61 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
70%

Weldability

18 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

82 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

21 MJ/kg9,028 BTU/lb
20 MJ/kg8,598 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.8 kg CO₂/kg
1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

85%
90%

Same in both: Embodied Water 45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

127 kN·m/kg
81 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.2 MN·m/kg
23.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,266 kJ/m³
473 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.8 mm²/s
10.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA536 80-55-06A536 120-90-02

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA536 120-90-02A536 80-55-06
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A536 120-90-02 vs A536 80-55-06 — frequently asked

Is A536 120-90-02 stronger than A536 80-55-06?

Yes. A536 120-90-02 has a typical yield strength of 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for A536 80-55-06 — about 65% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 575 MPa (83.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A536 120-90-02 or A536 80-55-06?

A536 80-55-06 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A536 120-90-02 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, A536 120-90-02 or A536 80-55-06?

A536 80-55-06. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against fair (35/100) for A536 120-90-02; for welding the order is A536 80-55-06 first (poor, 30/100) then A536 120-90-02 (poor, 18/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A536 120-90-02 and A536 80-55-06 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.