FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A536 120-90-02 vs A536 60-40-18

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A536 120-90-02 and A536 60-40-18 are both steel grades. A536 120-90-02 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for A536 60-40-18, about 120% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi). In exchange, A536 60-40-18 is the more ductile: elongation 23% versus 3% for A536 120-90-02, and A536 120-90-02 is harder (302 HB vs 150 HB). A536 60-40-18 conducts heat better (36 W/m·K vs 32 W/m·K). On the shop floor, A536 60-40-18 machines more easily (very good vs fair) and A536 60-40-18 welds better (32 vs 18 out of 100).

A536 120-90-02Choose it when strength drives the design.

A536 60-40-18Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

A536 120-90-02 vs A536 60-40-18: properties

A536 120-90-02A536 60-40-18

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

172 GPa24.9 Msi
169 GPa24.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

66 GPa9.6 Msi
65 GPa9.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

138 GPa20 Msi
135 GPa19.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

900 MPa131 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

660 MPa95.7 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
23%

Reduction in Area

3%
19%

Compressive Strength

1,500 MPa218 ksi
730 MPa106 ksi

Shear Strength

800 MPa116 ksi
385 MPa55.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

35 MPa·√m31.9 ksi·√in
37 MPa·√m33.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

9 J6.6 ft·lbf
16 J11.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

302 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

32 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

318 HV
158 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
80 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.28

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,165°C2,129 °F
1,160°C2,120 °F

Same in both: Density 7.1 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,140°C2,084 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

32 W/m·K18.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 350°C662 °F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.7 % IACS
3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.2 µΩ·in
5.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.61 V
-0.65 V

Corrosion Resistance

16 / 100
18 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
72 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
82%

Weldability

18 / 100
32 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
6 / 100

Castability

82 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.8 kg CO₂/kg
1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

85%
80%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 21 MJ/kg9,028 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

127 kN·m/kg
63 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.2 MN·m/kg
23.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,266 kJ/m³
266 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.8 mm²/s
11 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA536 60-40-18A536 120-90-02

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA536 120-90-02A536 60-40-18
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A536 120-90-02 vs A536 60-40-18 — frequently asked

Is A536 120-90-02 stronger than A536 60-40-18?

Yes. A536 120-90-02 has a typical yield strength of 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for A536 60-40-18 — about 120% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A536 120-90-02 or A536 60-40-18?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, A536 120-90-02 or A536 60-40-18?

A536 60-40-18. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against fair (35/100) for A536 120-90-02; for welding the order is A536 60-40-18 first (poor, 32/100) then A536 120-90-02 (poor, 18/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A536 120-90-02 and A536 60-40-18 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.