FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A536 100-70-03 vs A536 80-55-06

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A536 100-70-03 and A536 80-55-06 are both steel grades. A536 100-70-03 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for A536 80-55-06, about 30% more; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 575 MPa (83.4 ksi). In exchange, A536 80-55-06 is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 4% for A536 100-70-03, and A536 100-70-03 is harder (241 HB vs 195 HB). A536 100-70-03 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous). On the shop floor, A536 80-55-06 machines more easily (very good vs good) and A536 80-55-06 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A536 100-70-03 (standard, $$).

A536 100-70-03Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

A536 80-55-06Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

A536 100-70-03 vs A536 80-55-06: properties

A536 100-70-03A536 80-55-06

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

130 GPa18.9 Msi
135 GPa19.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

760 MPa110 ksi
575 MPa83.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
8%

Reduction in Area

4%
—

Compressive Strength

900 MPa131 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Shear Strength

660 MPa95.7 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

9 J6.6 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

241 HB
195 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

100 HRB
92 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

23 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

252 HV
205 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 169 GPa24.5 Msi · Shear Modulus 65 GPa9.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.28

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,165°C2,129 °F
1,170°C2,138 °F

Same in both: Density 7.1 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,150°C2,102 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

32 W/m·K18.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
35 W/m·K20.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.9 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.61 V · Corrosion Resistance 15 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
70%

Weldability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

3 / 100
5 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.7 kg CO₂/kg
1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
90%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 20 MJ/kg8,598 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

107 kN·m/kg
81 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

800 kJ/m³
473 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.8 mm²/s
10.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
10

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 23.8 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA536 100-70-03A536 80-55-06

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA536 100-70-03A536 80-55-06
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A536 100-70-03 vs A536 80-55-06 — frequently asked

Is A536 100-70-03 stronger than A536 80-55-06?

Yes. A536 100-70-03 has a typical yield strength of 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for A536 80-55-06 — about 30% more. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 575 MPa (83.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A536 100-70-03 or A536 80-55-06?

A536 80-55-06 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A536 100-70-03 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, A536 100-70-03 or A536 80-55-06?

A536 80-55-06. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for A536 100-70-03; for welding the order is A536 80-55-06 first (poor, 30/100) then A536 100-70-03 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A536 100-70-03 and A536 80-55-06 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.