FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A536 100-70-03 vs A536 60-40-18

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A536 100-70-03 and A536 60-40-18 are both steel grades. A536 100-70-03 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for A536 60-40-18, about 73% more; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi). In exchange, A536 60-40-18 is the more ductile: elongation 23% versus 4% for A536 100-70-03, and A536 100-70-03 is harder (241 HB vs 150 HB). A536 100-70-03 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous) and A536 60-40-18 conducts heat better (36 W/m·K vs 32 W/m·K). On the shop floor, A536 60-40-18 machines more easily (very good vs good).

A536 100-70-03Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

A536 60-40-18Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

A536 100-70-03 vs A536 60-40-18: properties

A536 100-70-03A536 60-40-18

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

130 GPa18.9 Msi
135 GPa19.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

760 MPa110 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
23%

Reduction in Area

4%
19%

Compressive Strength

900 MPa131 ksi
730 MPa106 ksi

Shear Strength

660 MPa95.7 ksi
385 MPa55.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
37 MPa·√m33.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

9 J6.6 ft·lbf
16 J11.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

241 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

100 HRB
80 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

23 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

252 HV
158 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 169 GPa24.5 Msi · Shear Modulus 65 GPa9.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.28

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,150°C2,102 °F
1,140°C2,084 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,165°C2,129 °F
1,160°C2,120 °F

Same in both: Density 7.1 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

32 W/m·K18.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.9 % IACS
3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in
5.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.61 V
-0.65 V

Corrosion Resistance

15 / 100
18 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
72 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
82%

Weldability

25 / 100
32 / 100

Formability (cold)

3 / 100
6 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

20 MJ/kg8,598 BTU/lb
21 MJ/kg9,028 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.7 kg CO₂/kg
1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
80%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

107 kN·m/kg
63 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

800 kJ/m³
266 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.8 mm²/s
11 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
8

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 23.8 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA536 100-70-03A536 60-40-18

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA536 100-70-03A536 60-40-18
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A536 100-70-03 vs A536 60-40-18 — frequently asked

Is A536 100-70-03 stronger than A536 60-40-18?

Yes. A536 100-70-03 has a typical yield strength of 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for A536 60-40-18 — about 73% more. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A536 100-70-03 or A536 60-40-18?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, A536 100-70-03 or A536 60-40-18?

A536 60-40-18. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (55/100) for A536 100-70-03; for welding the order is A536 60-40-18 first (poor, 32/100) then A536 100-70-03 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A536 100-70-03 and A536 60-40-18 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.