FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A335 P22 vs SUH660

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A335 P22 and SUH660 are both steel grades, both heat resistant steel. SUH660 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 725 MPa (105 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for A335 P22, about 107% more; tensile strength follows at 1,010 MPa (146 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi). SUH660 is harder — 290 HB against 165 HB for A335 P22 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. SUH660 runs hotter in service (700°C vs 550°C continuous) and A335 P22 conducts heat better (37 W/m·K vs 13 W/m·K). On the shop floor, A335 P22 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and A335 P22 forms better (fair vs poor).

A335 P22Choose it when the part is machined in volume.

SUH660Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

A335 P22 vs SUH660: properties

A335 P22SUH660

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

207 GPa30 Msi
201 GPa29.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
176 GPa25.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.31

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
1,010 MPa146 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
725 MPa105 ksi

Elongation at Break

24%
22%

Reduction in Area

55%
40%

Compressive Strength

355 MPa51.5 ksi
740 MPa107 ksi

Shear Strength

360 MPa52.2 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

255 MPa37 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
50 J36.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

165 HB
290 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

85 HRB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

12 HRC
30 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

173 HV
305 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.94 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

37 W/m·K21.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
13 W/m·K7.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.4 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F
16.4 µm/m·K9.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

550°C1,022 °F
700°C1,292 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7.8 % IACS
1.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
9.1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

18 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
20 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

52%
15%

Weldability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

48 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

33 MJ/kg14,187 BTU/lb
90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.4 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

70 kN·m/kg
127 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.4 MN·m/kg
25.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

296 kJ/m³
1,308 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

10.2 mm²/s
3.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSUH660A335 P22

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA335 P22SUH660
Default conditionHRSTA
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

A335 P22 vs SUH660 — frequently asked

Is SUH660 stronger than A335 P22?

Yes. SUH660 has a typical yield strength of 725 MPa (105 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for A335 P22 — about 107% more. Tensile strength is 1,010 MPa (146 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A335 P22 or SUH660?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, A335 P22 or SUH660?

A335 P22. Its machinability rates fair (50/100) against poor (20/100) for SUH660; for welding the order is SUH660 first (good, 55/100) then A335 P22 (fair, 50/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A335 P22 and SUH660 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.