FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 60SiCr8 vs 65Mn

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 60SiCr8 and 65Mn are both steel grades. 60SiCr8 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,550 MPa (225 ksi) against 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) for 65Mn, about 3.5 times as much; tensile strength follows at 1,750 MPa (254 ksi) vs 760 MPa (110 ksi). In exchange, 65Mn is the more ductile: elongation 16% versus 8% for 60SiCr8, and 60SiCr8 is harder (460 HB vs 215 HB). 65Mn runs hotter in service (350°C vs 250°C continuous) and 65Mn conducts heat better (45 W/m·K vs 30 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 65Mn machines more easily (fair vs poor), 65Mn welds better (poor vs not recommended), and 60SiCr8 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 65Mn (standard, $$).

60SiCr8Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

65MnChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

60SiCr8 vs 65Mn: properties

60SiCr865Mn

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,750 MPa254 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,550 MPa225 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
16%

Reduction in Area

30%
40%

Compressive Strength

1,600 MPa232 ksi
—

Shear Strength

1,050 MPa152 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

750 MPa109 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

15 J11.1 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

460 HB
215 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

48 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

490 HV
225 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
95 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 206 GPa29.9 Msi · Shear Modulus 79 GPa11.5 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

30 W/m·K17.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

475 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

5.2 % IACS
8.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m13 µΩ·in
2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.61 V

Corrosion Resistance

12 / 100
10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

15%
55%

Weldability

12 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

—
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb
25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

223 kN·m/kg
97 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

5,831 kJ/m³
470 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

8 mm²/s
12.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

22
14

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.2 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale65Mn60SiCr8

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60SiCr865Mn
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

60SiCr8 vs 65Mn — frequently asked

Is 60SiCr8 stronger than 65Mn?

Yes. 60SiCr8 has a typical yield strength of 1,550 MPa (225 ksi) against 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) for 65Mn — about 3.5 times as much. Tensile strength is 1,750 MPa (254 ksi) vs 760 MPa (110 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 60SiCr8 or 65Mn?

60SiCr8 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 65Mn is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 60SiCr8 or 65Mn?

65Mn. Its machinability rates fair (50/100) against poor (15/100) for 60SiCr8; for welding the order is 65Mn first (poor, 25/100) then 60SiCr8 (not recommended, 12/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 60SiCr8 and 65Mn side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.