FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1075 vs 60SiCr8

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1075 and 60SiCr8 are both steel grades. 60SiCr8 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,550 MPa (225 ksi) against 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) for 1075, about 3.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 1,750 MPa (254 ksi) vs 830 MPa (120 ksi). In exchange, 1075 is the more ductile: elongation 11% versus 8% for 60SiCr8, and 60SiCr8 is harder (460 HB vs 235 HB). 1075 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 250°C continuous) and 1075 conducts heat better (48 W/m·K vs 30 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 1075 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and 60SiCr8 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 1075 (standard, $$).

1075Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

60SiCr8Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

1075 vs 60SiCr8: properties

107560SiCr8

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
206 GPa29.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

830 MPa120 ksi
1,750 MPa254 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
1,550 MPa225 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
8%

Reduction in Area

20%
30%

Shear Strength

520 MPa75.4 ksi
1,050 MPa152 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

370 MPa53.7 ksi
750 MPa109 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

9 J6.6 ft·lbf
15 J11.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

235 HB
460 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

99 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

247 HV
490 HV

Compressive Strength

—
1,600 MPa232 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
48 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,470°C2,678 °F
1,490°C2,714 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
30 W/m·K17.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 475 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
5.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.09 µΩ·in
3.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.65 V
-0.6 V

Corrosion Resistance

8 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
15 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
15%

Weldability

18 / 100
12 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
—

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
2.1 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

28%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

106 kN·m/kg
223 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

539 kJ/m³
5,831 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.9 mm²/s
8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
22

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale107560SiCr8

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability107560SiCr8
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

1075 vs 60SiCr8 — frequently asked

Is 60SiCr8 stronger than 1075?

Yes. 60SiCr8 has a typical yield strength of 1,550 MPa (225 ksi) against 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) for 1075 — about 3.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 1,750 MPa (254 ksi) vs 830 MPa (120 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1075 or 60SiCr8?

60SiCr8 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 1075 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1075 or 60SiCr8?

1075. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (15/100) for 60SiCr8; for welding the order is 1075 first (poor, 18/100) then 60SiCr8 (not recommended, 12/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1075 and 60SiCr8 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.