FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 35W250 vs M47

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 35W250 and M47 are both steel grades. M47 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for 35W250, about 58% more; tensile strength follows at 890 MPa (129 ksi) vs 480 MPa (69.6 ksi). M47 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 12% for 35W250, and M47 is harder (255 HB vs 180 HB). 35W250 is lighter (7.65 g/cm³ vs 8.03 g/cm³ for M47) and M47 is stiffer (218 GPa vs 195 GPa). On the shop floor, 35W250 machines more easily (fair vs poor), 35W250 welds better (fair vs poor), and 35W250 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than M47 (high, $$$$).

35W250Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

M47Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

35W250 vs M47: properties

35W250M47

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

195 GPa28.3 Msi
218 GPa31.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
85 GPa12.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
890 MPa129 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
18%

Compressive Strength

360 MPa52.2 ksi
—

Shear Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
580 MPa84.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

210 MPa30.5 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
22 J16.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

180 HB
255 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

82 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

190 HV
268 HV

Reduction in Area

—
30%

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
35 MPa·√m31.9 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
25 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
8.03 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,250°C2,282 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
3.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
5.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

18 / 100
15 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.55 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
30%

Weldability

35 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
15 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb
58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.4 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
85 L/kg10.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

63 kN·m/kg
111 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
27.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

332 kJ/m³
745 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6.7 mm²/s
7.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale35W250M47

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability35W250M47
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionFinal Annealed—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black OxideYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
E-CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—
Zinc PlatingYes—
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) CoatingYes—
Zinc-Nickel PlatingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

35W250 vs M47 — frequently asked

Is M47 stronger than 35W250?

Yes. M47 has a typical yield strength of 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for 35W250 — about 58% more. Tensile strength is 890 MPa (129 ksi) vs 480 MPa (69.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 35W250 or M47?

35W250 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while M47 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 35W250 or M47?

35W250. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (30/100) for M47; for welding the order is 35W250 first (fair, 35/100) then M47 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 35W250 and M47 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.