FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 35W250 vs M27

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 35W250 and M27 are both steel grades. 35W250 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for M27, about 14% more; tensile strength follows at 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi). In exchange, M27 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 12% for 35W250, and 35W250 is harder (190 HV vs 170 HV). M27 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 180°C continuous) and M27 conducts electricity better (3.8 % IACS vs 3.1 % IACS). On the shop floor, M27 welds better (good vs fair) and M27 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 35W250 (standard, $$).

35W250Choose it when strength drives the design.

M27Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

35W250 vs M27: properties

35W250M27

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

195 GPa28.3 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
315 MPa45.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
28%

Compressive Strength

360 MPa52.2 ksi
—

Shear Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

180 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

82 HRB
84 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

190 HV
170 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 210 MPa30.5 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
3.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
4.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m17.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

18 / 100
14 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
50%

Weldability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb
34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.4 kg CO₂/kg
2.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

63 kN·m/kg
58 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
25.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

332 kJ/m³
248 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 6.7 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale35W250M27

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability35W250M27
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionFinal Annealed—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black OxideYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
E-CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—
Zinc PlatingYes—
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) CoatingYes—
Zinc-Nickel PlatingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

35W250 vs M27 — frequently asked

Is 35W250 stronger than M27?

Yes. 35W250 has a typical yield strength of 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for M27 — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 35W250 or M27?

M27 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 35W250 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 35W250 or M27?

M27. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against fair (35/100) for 35W250.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 35W250 and M27 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.