FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 35A250 vs 35W250

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 35A250 and 35W250 are both steel grades. Both yield at about 370 MPa — strength does not separate them. 35A250 is the more ductile: elongation 16% versus 12% for 35W250, and 35W250 is harder (190 HV vs 180 HV). 35A250 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 180°C continuous). On the shop floor, 35A250 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 35W250 (standard, $$).

35A250Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

35A250 vs 35W250: properties

35A25035W250

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

190 GPa27.6 Msi
195 GPa28.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

500 MPa72.5 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

370 MPa53.7 ksi
360 MPa52.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

16%
12%

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

8 J5.9 ft·lbf
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

88 HRB
82 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

180 HV
190 HV

Compressive Strength

—
360 MPa52.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

—
180 HB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.6 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,480°C2,696 °F
1,490°C2,714 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 1,510°C2,750 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

23 W/m·K13.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
180°C356 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.3 % IACS
3.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m20.5 µΩ·in
5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

15 / 100
18 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
45%

Weldability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.4 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

66 kN·m/kg
63 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

360 kJ/m³
332 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6.4 mm²/s
6.7 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale35W25035A250

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability35A25035W250
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Final Annealed
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black Oxide—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes
Zinc Plating—Yes
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) Coating—Yes
Zinc-Nickel Plating—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

35A250 vs 35W250 — frequently asked

What is the difference between 35A250 and 35W250?

Steel 35A250 and 35W250 are both steel grades. Both yield at about 370 MPa — strength does not separate them. 35A250 is the more ductile: elongation 16% versus 12% for 35W250, and 35W250 is harder (190 HV vs 180 HV).

Which is cheaper, 35A250 or 35W250?

35A250 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 35W250 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 35A250 or 35W250?

35W250, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 40/100 for 35A250; for welding the order is 35A250 first (fair, 40/100) then 35W250 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 35A250 and 35W250 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.