FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 30Q140 vs 35W250

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 30Q140 and 35W250 are both steel grades. 35W250 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for 30Q140, about 16% more; tensile strength follows at 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi). 35W250 is stiffer (195 GPa vs 120 GPa) and 35W250 runs hotter in service (180°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 35W250 machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100) and 35W250 forms better (fair vs poor).

35W250Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

30Q140 vs 35W250: properties

30Q14035W250

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
195 GPa28.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

310 MPa45 ksi
360 MPa52.2 ksi

Shear Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

175 HB
180 HB

Hardness, Vickers

185 HV
190 HV

Shear Modulus

—
76 GPa11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Compressive Strength

—
360 MPa52.2 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
82 HRB

Same in both: Elongation at Break 12%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,470°C2,678 °F
1,490°C2,714 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,505°C2,741 °F
1,510°C2,750 °F

Same in both: Density 7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

23 W/m·K13.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
180°C356 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.6 % IACS
3.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m18.9 µΩ·in
5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

20 / 100
18 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
45%

Weldability

30 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

35 MJ/kg15,047 BTU/lb
32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

46 kN·m/kg
63 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.7 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

400 kJ/m³
332 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6.4 mm²/s
6.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale35W25030Q140

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability30Q14035W250
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Final Annealed
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black Oxide—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes
Zinc Plating—Yes
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) Coating—Yes
Zinc-Nickel Plating—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

30Q140 vs 35W250 — frequently asked

Is 35W250 stronger than 30Q140?

Yes. 35W250 has a typical yield strength of 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for 30Q140 — about 16% more. Tensile strength is 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 30Q140 or 35W250?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 30Q140 or 35W250?

35W250, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for 30Q140; for welding the order is 35W250 first (fair, 35/100) then 30Q140 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 30Q140 and 35W250 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.