FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 30Q130 vs Alloy 79

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 30Q130 and Alloy 79 are both steel grades. 30Q130 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) against 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) for Alloy 79, about 17% more. In exchange, Alloy 79 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 8% for 30Q130, and 30Q130 is harder (160 HB vs 120 HB). 30Q130 is lighter (7.65 g/cm³ vs 8.74 g/cm³ for Alloy 79) and Alloy 79 is stiffer (205 GPa vs 120 GPa). On the shop floor, Alloy 79 welds better (good vs fair) and 30Q130 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Alloy 79 (high, $$$$).

30Q130Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Alloy 79Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

30Q130 vs Alloy 79: properties

30Q130Alloy 79

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

47 GPa6.8 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
172 GPa24.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

345 MPa50 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

315 MPa45.7 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
40%

Shear Strength

230 MPa33.4 ksi
370 MPa53.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

160 MPa23.2 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

160 HB
120 HB

Hardness, Vickers

170 HV
125 HV

Reduction in Area

—
60%

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
160 J118 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
65 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
8.74 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,470°C2,678 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

22 W/m·K12.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
30 W/m·K17.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.6 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
12.7 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
290 J/g125 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.6 % IACS
3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m18.9 µΩ·in
5.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

18 / 100
50 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.2 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
32 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
30%

Weldability

35 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
11 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

45 kN·m/kg
63 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.7 MN·m/kg
23.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

413 kJ/m³
178 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6 mm²/s
7.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlloy 7930Q130

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability30Q130Alloy 79
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

30Q130 vs Alloy 79 — frequently asked

Is 30Q130 stronger than Alloy 79?

Yes. 30Q130 has a typical yield strength of 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) against 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) for Alloy 79 — about 17% more. Tensile strength is 345 MPa (50 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 30Q130 or Alloy 79?

30Q130 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Alloy 79 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 30Q130 or Alloy 79?

30Q130. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (32/100) for Alloy 79; for welding the order is Alloy 79 first (good, 60/100) then 30Q130 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 30Q130 and Alloy 79 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.