FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs H11

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel and H11 are both steel grades. 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,400 MPa (203 ksi) against 510 MPa (74 ksi) for H11, about 175% more; tensile strength follows at 1,450 MPa (210 ksi) vs 800 MPa (116 ksi). In exchange, H11 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 12% for 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel, and 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel is harder (400 HB vs 200 HB). H11 is stiffer (210 GPa vs 186 GPa) and H11 runs hotter in service (540°C vs 400°C continuous). On the shop floor, H11 machines more easily (good vs poor), 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel welds better (very good vs fair), and H11 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel (high, $$$$).

18Ni(200) Maraging SteelChoose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

H11Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs H11: properties

18Ni(200) Maraging SteelH11

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

186 GPa27 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,450 MPa210 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,400 MPa203 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
20%

Reduction in Area

60%
45%

Compressive Strength

1,420 MPa206 ksi
—

Shear Strength

870 MPa126 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

600 MPa87 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

155 MPa·√m141 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
40 J29.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

400 HB
200 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

43 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

420 HV
210 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
94 HRB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,413°C2,575 °F
1,427°C2,601 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,470°C2,678 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

20.5 W/m·K11.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

452 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.1 µm/m·K5.6 µin/in·°F
11.9 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
540°C1,004 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.8 % IACS
3.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m17.7 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m20.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.52 V
-0.6 V

Corrosion Resistance

25 / 100
18 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
45%

Weldability

70 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb
34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
2.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
70 L/kg8.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

181 kN·m/kg
103 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.3 MN·m/kg
26.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

5,269 kJ/m³
619 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.7 mm²/s
7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleH1118Ni(200) Maraging Steel

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability18Ni(200) Maraging SteelH11
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs H11 — frequently asked

Is 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel stronger than H11?

Yes. 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel has a typical yield strength of 1,400 MPa (203 ksi) against 510 MPa (74 ksi) for H11 — about 175% more. Tensile strength is 1,450 MPa (210 ksi) vs 800 MPa (116 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel or H11?

H11 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel or H11?

H11. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (30/100) for 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel; for welding the order is 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel first (very good, 70/100) then H11 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel and H11 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.