FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1040 vs E335

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1040 and E335 are both steel grades. 1040 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 355 MPa (51.5 ksi) for E335, about 17% more. 1040 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 18% for E335, and 1040 is harder (201 HB vs 180 HB). 1040 runs hotter in service (425°C vs 350°C continuous).

1040Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1040 vs E335: properties

1040E335

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

415 MPa60.2 ksi
355 MPa51.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
18%

Reduction in Area

50%
40%

Compressive Strength

415 MPa60.2 ksi
345 MPa50 ksi

Shear Strength

385 MPa55.8 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

290 MPa42.1 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

45 J33.2 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

201 HB
180 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

93 HRB
89 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
190 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 620 MPa89.9 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,495°C2,723 °F
1,490°C2,714 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

51 W/m·K29.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

486 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
11.7 µm/m·K6.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
350°C662 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 247 J/g106 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.71×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.73 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 10 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.61 V
-0.6 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
57%

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 55 / 100 · Weldability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

50 L/kg6 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

420 kJ/m³
300 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.4 mm²/s
13 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
12

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 79 kN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1040E335

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1040E335
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

1040 vs E335 — frequently asked

Is 1040 stronger than E335?

Yes. 1040 has a typical yield strength of 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 355 MPa (51.5 ksi) for E335 — about 17% more. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1040 or E335?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose 1040 over E335?

Pick 1040 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1040 and E335 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.