FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1040 vs C35E

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1040 and C35E are both steel grades. C35E is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) against 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) for 1040, about 6% more. In exchange, 1040 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 20% for C35E.

1040Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C35EChoose it when strength drives the design.

1040 vs C35E: properties

1040C35E

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
660 MPa95.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

415 MPa60.2 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
20%

Compressive Strength

415 MPa60.2 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Shear Strength

385 MPa55.8 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

290 MPa42.1 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in
60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

45 J33.2 ft·lbf
50 J36.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

201 HB
200 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
15 HRC

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Reduction in Area 50% · Hardness, Rockwell B 93 HRB · Hardness, Vickers 210 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,495°C2,723 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

51 W/m·K29.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
47 W/m·K27.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

486 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

247 J/g106 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.71×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.73 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 10 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.61 V
-0.6 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
65%

Weldability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

50 L/kg6 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

79 kN·m/kg
84 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

420 kJ/m³
440 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.4 mm²/s
12.7 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 13

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1040C35E

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1040C35E
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

1040 vs C35E — frequently asked

Is C35E stronger than 1040?

Yes. C35E has a typical tensile strength of 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) against 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) for 1040 — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, 1040 or C35E?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 1040 or C35E?

C35E. Its weldability rates fair (50/100) against fair (45/100) for 1040.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1040 and C35E side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.