FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1030 vs C25

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1030 and C25 are both steel grades. 1030 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) for C25, about 7% more. In exchange, C25 is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 20% for 1030, and 1030 is harder (137 HB vs 126 HB). On the shop floor, C25 welds better (excellent vs good).

1030Choose it when strength drives the design.

C25Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

1030 vs C25: properties

1030C25

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
30%

Reduction in Area

42%
60%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Shear Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in
80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
65 J47.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

137 HB
126 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

75 HRB
71 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
132 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,515°C2,759 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

51.9 W/m·K30 BTU/hr·ft·°F
51 W/m·K29.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

486 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.7 µm/m·K6.5 µin/in·°F
11.9 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

247 J/g106 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 10 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.61 V · Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

62 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
65 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 65% · Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

30%
28%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

60 kN·m/kg
56 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

165 kJ/m³
167 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.6 mm²/s
13.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1030C25

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1030C25
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

1030 vs C25 — frequently asked

Is 1030 stronger than C25?

Yes. 1030 has a typical tensile strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) for C25 — about 7% more.

Which is cheaper, 1030 or C25?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1030 or C25?

C25, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 62/100 against 55/100 for 1030; for welding the order is C25 first (excellent, 88/100) then 1030 (good, 62/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1030 and C25 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.