FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel ER2553 vs ER308H

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel ER2553 and ER308H are both stainless steel grades. ER2553 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 600 MPa (87 ksi) against 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) for ER308H, about 45% more; tensile strength follows at 830 MPa (120 ksi) vs 590 MPa (85.6 ksi). In exchange, ER308H is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 22% for ER2553, and ER2553 is harder (265 HB vs 175 HB). ER308H runs hotter in service (800°C vs 280°C continuous) and ER308H conducts electricity better (2.4 % IACS vs 2.1 % IACS). On the shop floor, ER308H machines more easily (fair vs poor), ER308H welds better (excellent vs very good), and ER308H sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than ER2553 (high, $$$$).

ER2553Choose it when strength drives the design.

ER308HChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

ER2553 vs ER308H: properties

ER2553ER308H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
196 GPa28.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

830 MPa120 ksi
590 MPa85.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

600 MPa87 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
38%

Reduction in Area

45%
55%

Compressive Strength

610 MPa88.5 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Shear Strength

500 MPa72.5 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
180 MPa·√m164 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

65 J47.9 ft·lbf
85 J62.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

265 HB
175 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

103 HRB
87 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

27 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

280 HV
185 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.81 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,350°C2,462 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,440°C2,624 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13 µm/m·K7.2 µin/in·°F
16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

280°C536 °F
800°C1,472 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.1 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

8.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m33.1 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

84 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
40%

Weldability

70 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.8 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

55%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

106 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
24.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

900 kJ/m³
439 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4 mm²/s
4.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleER308HER2553

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityER2553ER308H
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

ER2553 vs ER308H — frequently asked

Is ER2553 stronger than ER308H?

Yes. ER2553 has a typical yield strength of 600 MPa (87 ksi) against 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) for ER308H — about 45% more. Tensile strength is 830 MPa (120 ksi) vs 590 MPa (85.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ER2553 or ER308H?

ER308H is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while ER2553 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ER2553 or ER308H?

ER308H. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (22/100) for ER2553; for welding the order is ER308H first (excellent, 88/100) then ER2553 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ER2553 and ER308H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.