FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel E16-8-2 vs ER308H

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel E16-8-2 and ER308H are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 420 MPa — strength does not separate them. E16-8-2 is harder — 185 HB against 175 HB for ER308H — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, ER308H welds better (excellent vs very good) and ER308H sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than E16-8-2 (high, $$$$).

E16-8-2Choose it when surface hardness matters.

ER308HChoose it when it will be welded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

E16-8-2 vs ER308H: properties

E16-8-2ER308H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

195 GPa28.3 Msi
196 GPa28.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

165 GPa23.9 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

600 MPa87 ksi
590 MPa85.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
38%

Compressive Strength

425 MPa61.6 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in
180 MPa·√m164 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

75 J55.3 ft·lbf
85 J62.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

185 HB
175 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

90 HRB
87 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

195 HV
185 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Reduction in Area 55% · Shear Strength 400 MPa58 ksi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 230 MPa33.4 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,445°C2,633 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Same in both: Density 7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16 W/m·K9.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

760°C1,400 °F
800°C1,472 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.3 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.5 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.05 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

78 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

—
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 38 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 40% · Formability (cold) 55 / 100 · Polishability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.8 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

45%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

76 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.7 MN·m/kg
24.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

452 kJ/m³
439 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 4.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleER308HE16-8-2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityE16-8-2ER308H
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

E16-8-2 vs ER308H — frequently asked

What is the difference between E16-8-2 and ER308H?

Stainless Steel E16-8-2 and ER308H are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 420 MPa — strength does not separate them. E16-8-2 is harder — 185 HB against 175 HB for ER308H — which matters for wear surfaces and threads.

Which is cheaper, E16-8-2 or ER308H?

ER308H is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while E16-8-2 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, E16-8-2 or ER308H?

ER308H. Its weldability rates excellent (88/100) against very good (78/100) for E16-8-2.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in E16-8-2 and ER308H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.