FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 304 vs Nitronic 50

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 304 and Nitronic 50 are both stainless steel grades. Nitronic 50 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 304, about 80% more; tensile strength follows at 800 MPa (116 ksi) vs 585 MPa (84.8 ksi). In exchange, 304 is the more ductile: elongation 55% versus 45% for Nitronic 50, and Nitronic 50 is harder (217 HB vs 150 HB). 304 runs hotter in service (870°C vs 800°C continuous) and 304 conducts heat better (16.2 W/m·K vs 12.5 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 304 machines more easily (fair vs poor), 304 welds better (excellent vs very good), and 304 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Nitronic 50 (specialty, $$$$$).

304Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Nitronic 50Choose it when strength drives the design.

304 vs Nitronic 50: properties

304Nitronic 50

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

193 GPa28 Msi
196 GPa28.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

77 GPa11.2 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
158 GPa22.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

55%
45%

Reduction in Area

70%
62%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
—

Shear Strength

415 MPa60.2 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

220 MPa·√m200 ksi·√in
200 MPa·√m182 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

200 J148 ft·lbf
190 J140 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
217 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

82 HRB
96 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

160 HV
228 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.88 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,343°C2,449 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,399°C2,550 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
12.5 W/m·K7.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
502 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.3 µm/m·K9.6 µin/in·°F
15.3 µm/m·K8.5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

285 J/g123 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

870°C1,598 °F
800°C1,472 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.4 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.05 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
25%

Weldability

88 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

88 / 100
72 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.4 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

73 kN·m/kg
102 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.1 MN·m/kg
24.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

162 kJ/m³
517 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4.1 mm²/s
3.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale304Nitronic 50

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability304Nitronic 50
Casting & forgingYes—
Default conditionAnnealedSolution Annealed
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 32 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, CrN, DLC, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing and 20 more.

304 vs Nitronic 50 — frequently asked

Is Nitronic 50 stronger than 304?

Yes. Nitronic 50 has a typical yield strength of 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 304 — about 80% more. Tensile strength is 800 MPa (116 ksi) vs 585 MPa (84.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 304 or Nitronic 50?

304 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Nitronic 50 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 304 or Nitronic 50?

304. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (28/100) for Nitronic 50; for welding the order is 304 first (excellent, 88/100) then Nitronic 50 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 304 and Nitronic 50 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.